The Morally Disabled on Property Rights

Officials with the Second Amendment Foundation have said the rule is illegal and planned to sue the city once the law went into effect. But Nickels doesn't believe the city is acting beyond its power, saying he is asserting the same rights private property owners have. [More]
What do they say? Possession is nine-tenths of the law?

Why would we expect a career kleptocrat to recognize the distinction between property and plunder?

Or recognize rights?

There's just no reasoning with moral retards.

[Via Bruce W. Krafft]

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "The Morally Disabled on Property Rights"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus