We're the Only Ones Objectively Reasonable Enough

Chief Locke thrust his knee between [Diane's] legs, and while Diane was still leaning on the hood of the patrol car, Chief Locke began to paw and stroke her, beginning at Diane’s waist and moving down to her buttocks [More]
And it's not the first time!
A couple of months before Cook, Locke was sued for sexual misconduct involving another woman...
So what's proper "Only One" protocol when Diane's husband objected?
Michael took one step toward Chief Locke. Chief Locke told Michael to “[g]et back in the fucking car” and, at the same time, Chief Locke tasered Michael. Michael never saw the taser.
So what could a court decide except:
In evaluating Appellees’ motion for summary judgment, the district court concluded, “[Chief] Locke’s conduct, in tasering and causing Michael’s head to strike the subject vehicles, [was] objectively reasonable as a matter of law.”
Everybody knows their place, right?

So, gee, if we can't get justice from the courts, what's left that would be objectively reasonable?

[Via Michael R]

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "We're the Only Ones Objectively Reasonable Enough"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus