Why The Nobel Peace Prize Should Go To Nuclear Weapons

Smoke billowing 20,000 feet above Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945, after the first atomic bomb was dropped on the city. The Japanese city of Hiroshima has marked the 64th anniversary of the world's first atomic attack as its mayor called for the total abolition of nuclear weapons in the coming decade. (AFP/The National Archives/File)

From Yahoo News/Time Magazine:

President Barack Obama's Nobel peace surprise was given "primarily for his work on and commitment to nuclear disarmament," according to Agot Valle, a Norwegian politician who served on the award committee. Valle told the Wall Street Journal that the stewards of the prize wanted to "support" Obama's goal, as expressed recently at the United Nations, "of a world without nuclear weapons."

Read more ....

My Comment: An interesting and contrary point of view.

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "Why The Nobel Peace Prize Should Go To Nuclear Weapons"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus