Here is a direct question—I DEFY anyone from the civilian disarmament camp to publicly and unequivocally provide a “yes" or “no” answer.
If someone buys a gun or ammunition, and either malfunction causing injury or property damage, can the victim(s) sue the manufacturer responsible for the product defect?
YES or NO?
The answer, of course, is “Yes,” and they know it. We’ve always been able to do so. There is no exemption or shielding from liability. To suggest otherwise is yet another example of prevarication everyone has come to expect.
Here’s another question: If Sarah Brady’s son accidentally or intentionally shoots someone with the rifle she bought him, should the victims be able to sue the gun manufacturer?
If someone buys a gun or ammunition, and either malfunction causing injury or property damage, can the victim(s) sue the manufacturer responsible for the product defect?
YES or NO?
The answer, of course, is “Yes,” and they know it. We’ve always been able to do so. There is no exemption or shielding from liability. To suggest otherwise is yet another example of prevarication everyone has come to expect.
Here’s another question: If Sarah Brady’s son accidentally or intentionally shoots someone with the rifle she bought him, should the victims be able to sue the gun manufacturer?