
- If removing a fixed number of guns from the population resulted in a directly attributable decrease in deaths, can we also demonstrate a commensurate level in continued deaths for the guns remaining in the population?
- Which part of the population participated in surrendering weapons (i.e., "law-abiding"?) Are the death reductions exclusive to that segment?
- Has there been a commensurate decrease in criminal activity?
- Has immigration policy introduced a new and statistically significant population growth demographic for which gun ownership is nontraditional?
- If removing a fixed number of guns from the population resulted in a directly attributable decrease in deaths, can we also demonstrate a commensurate level in continued deaths for the guns remaining in the population?
- Which part of the population participated in surrendering weapons (i.e., "law-abiding"?) Are the death reductions exclusive to that segment?
- Has there been a commensurate decrease in criminal activity?
- Has immigration policy introduced a new and statistically significant population growth demographic for which gun ownership is nontraditional?
I'd like to see someone who really knows his way around crunching the numbers and asking the right questions, like John Lott take a crack at this.