A career statist loon wants to ban handguns and dictate barrel lengths of long arms. Here's my reply. I encourage you to follow the link and leave comments of your own.
[Via Alphecca]
No, Mike.
That's it, just "no."
Now what are you going to do about it?
How many men like me, who refuse to bend to your will, are you willing to have killed or ruined in the futile attempt to enact your agenda? Because we won't just give up. We won't just surrender our guns.
And in order to get them out of the 80-plus million households in this country, you're going to need to conduct a full-blown national occupation. The "authorities" won't have time for 80-plus million search warrants and habeas corpus and all that other Constitutional nonsense, so it will just be block sweeps and dynamic entries. Nice police state your little fantasy will create.
What, you thought "benefits" didn't come with offsetting costs?
You're talking tripwire scenario here, Mike--real resistance and everything that implies.
And I assume you won't be doing the disarmament yourself--you expect hirelings to risk their necks doing your dirty work for you. Except most of those hirelings
have family. I wouldn't count on all of them staying "loyal."
It doesn't surprise me that you've worked for the state your entire career, that is, been a career statist, Mike. That much is evident from your attitudes. So I guess you haven't dealt all that much with free men who earn their own keep without relying on plundering the productive sector--perhaps you even had power to deny permits--that kind of stuff--make the rabble jump through your hoops, rather than be a public servant.
Free people don't need your permission to keep and bear arms, Mike. If you try to act like they do, you'll be in for a rude awakening.
[Via Alphecca]