Under any plausible standard of review, a legislature's choice to limit the citizenry to rifles, shotguns and other weapons less likely to augment urban violence need not, and should not, be viewed as an unconstitutional abridgment of the right of the people to keep or bear arms.OK, Larry--using your standard, let's see you walk down the streets of DC bearing a rifle or shotgun.
Oh, that's not allowed either? And that's OK--a "plausible standard" for your "scholarly interpretation" of what the Framers intended, too?
I find it more than creepy that a Cult of Set devotee of Thulsa Doom presumes to lecture anyone on "sanity."
What is the riddle of steel?
Apparently why you can't have it and they can.