A Threat of Immediate Harm

"[S]everal council members said they agreed with tougher language that requires weapons to be unloaded, disassembled or trigger locked, except when there is a "threat of immediate harm to a person" in the home."
We knew DC would play these stupid games. Here's the thing:

If government can openly defy rulings of their choosing, why shouldn't we?

It could be they won't end up liking the unintended consequences when not only has respect for the law been eroded, but also fear of it.

[Via Jeffersonian]

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "A Threat of Immediate Harm"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus