Well, I dunno, Barbie.
Like its "war" counterpart, don't you think that might depend on the question?
Still, I'm willing to hear you out. What's your rationale?
Like its "war" counterpart, don't you think that might depend on the question?
Still, I'm willing to hear you out. What's your rationale?
Even if people were given a greater opportunity to defend themselves with guns, it would not stop people from being killed. Think about it: If someone kills another person in defense of their own life, their attacker is dea
Even if people were given a greater opportunity to defend themselves with guns, it would not stop people from being killed. Think about it: If someone kills another person in defense of their own life, their attacker is dead. A life would be saved, but one would be lost, too. It is not our job to determine whose life is more valuable.OK, Barbie. I've thought about it. You've made your qualifications to offer advice on this more than clear.
And I think you win. Academia and law enforcement side with you: it's their job to determine whose life is more valuable. And ultimately, they're willing to kill anyone who defies the mandate foolish little girls like you have given them.