Does "Bear" Brady ... in the Woods?

An anti-gun group is suing to stop a last-second Bush administration change that would allow Americans to carry concealed, loaded guns in most national parks and wildlife refuges.

The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence sued the Interior Department in federal court on Tuesday. [More]
Because, you know, those of us who responsibly keep and bear arms everywhere else are going to get a sudden urge to take potshots at a moose with a handgun. Or something.

I wonder, if the suit is successful, if the Brady's will guarantee our safety in their "No Guns" zones--and assume financial responsibility if we're harmed because we weren't "allowed" defend ourselves?*

And they say there are no stupid questions...

David Hardy thinks they may have "standing" issues, but the DC Circuit also gives broad meaning to the term "germane."

*Not that some ever obey this evil foolishness anyway...

[Via Zachary G]

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "Does "Bear" Brady ... in the Woods?"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus