What a federal agent did during a testing procedure to result in "automatic" fire from an AR-15 has no bearing on the case of a man convicted of transferring a "machinegun" after he loaned to a prospective buyer the gun he considered a semi-automatic rifle, according to a ruling from a panel of appellate judges. [More]Bob Unruh and WorldNetDaily flesh out the story I talked about here.
Thing is, at this writing, WND is the only other news outlet talking about this. And most"gun-bloggers" aren't giving this any attention either.
Maybe I don't have a very good sense of what is newsworthy.