Because there was this.
I sent this:
Because they've been silent on this.
I must say, the almost absolute non-reaction on the Albert Kwan story from the "pro gun" community disappoints me. Aside from a very few notable exceptions, you'd never even know about it unless you regularly read Gun Rights Examiner.
Why do you suppose that is? And do you think a newspaper is likely to care if "activist gun owners" do not?
Here's a way to help correct that, if anyone is interested...
I sent this:
Because they've been silent on this.
I must say, the almost absolute non-reaction on the Albert Kwan story from the "pro gun" community disappoints me. Aside from a very few notable exceptions, you'd never even know about it unless you regularly read Gun Rights Examiner.
Why do you suppose that is? And do you think a newspaper is likely to care if "activist gun owners" do not?
Here's a way to help correct that, if anyone is interested...