From New Scientist:
Has the massive expansion of biodefence research in the US since the anthrax letters of 2001 made America a safer place, or more dangerous?
That's the burning question among specialists in infectious disease, after a flurry of concerns about safety at labs handling potential bioweapons agents.
Biosafety was already on the political agenda, with the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce having scheduled a hearing for 22 September on government oversight of high-containment biolabs.
But the hearing was given a sharper edge by the revelation that Malcolm Casabadan, a microbiologist at the University of Chicago, had died just days before.
Read more ....
My Comment: Considering the amount of money that is spent .... it better beworth it.
Has the massive expansion of biodefence research in the US since the anthrax letters of 2001 made America a safer place, or more dangerous?
That's the burning question among specialists in infectious disease, after a flurry of concerns about safety at labs handling potential bioweapons agents.
Biosafety was already on the political agenda, with the House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce having scheduled a hearing for 22 September on government oversight of high-containment biolabs.
But the hearing was given a sharper edge by the revelation that Malcolm Casabadan, a microbiologist at the University of Chicago, had died just days before.
Read more ....
My Comment: Considering the amount of money that is spent .... it better beworth it.