A Civil Debate

Advocates of the First and Second Amendments sat down together Tuesday to debate whether the state's list of 257,000 handgun-carry permit holders should be kept public -- but found little common ground beyond agreeing that the ongoing debate should be civil. [More]
See, that's the thing--as long as it remains civil, there's no real incentive to stop, is there? I don't think I'd be inclined toward civility if some snotty anti-gun punk posted my name under the guise of crusading journalism. The damn watchdogs are supposed to be watching the government.

But then, I don't have a dog in this fight.

Besides, I've already proposed a way gun owners who do can fight back.

Again and again and again...

Apparently, it's not civil enough.

[Via Kenny's Sideshow]

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "A Civil Debate"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus