About that "Proposed 28th Amendment"...

"Proposed" by whom? [More]

Besides, it presumes that if we can only find the right incantation, the usurpers will suddenly fall into line and behave.

They ignore the clear words, proscriptions and limitations already in place--they've taken their oath and broken it--daily--with no repercussions. What makes anyone think they would follow this--or not add weasel-wording to change the meaning of what they did pass? Assuming that's the route they chose, as opposed to, say, a Constitutional convention--with all the inherent dangers that could enable...?

The problem in this case is not with the Constitution. The problem is there's no "or else," and hasn't been for each betrayal.

[Via Peter R]

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "About that "Proposed 28th Amendment"..."

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus