This looks like the website of the nutjob in MD. I had to grab it off Google cache because the regular url is timing out.
Hmmm--an anti-human environmentalcase.
Why doesn't that surprise me?
I guess none of the hostages had "a 'good and substantial reason' to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is 'necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.'”
Why doesn't the fact that he chose unarmed victims surprise me either?
UPDATE: Looks like it took another man with a gun to resolve things. That's non-surprise #3.
Hmmm--an anti-human environmentalcase.
Why doesn't that surprise me?
I guess none of the hostages had "a 'good and substantial reason' to carry a handgun, including a finding that the permit is 'necessary as a reasonable precaution against apprehended danger.'”
Why doesn't the fact that he chose unarmed victims surprise me either?
UPDATE: Looks like it took another man with a gun to resolve things. That's non-surprise #3.