‘Paper of record’ should recognize hypocrisy better than most

It’s not liberal bias? And the mighty “Authorized Journalists” at The New York Times can find nothing new to report, but a couple of mere “bloggers” can come up with fresh finds on an almost-daily basis? But they somehow have the resources to jump on the gun control bandwagon—even though it’s not a scoop and every regressive rag and network out there is parroting the talking points from the Brady Campaign and the new Feinstein/Schumer/Whitehouse report?

Another damn lie. This is my shocked face. Talk about hypocrisy locked and loaded. [More]

Today's Gun Rights Examiner commentary notes there are lies, damned lies, and The New York Times.

Help correct the [paper of] record by sharing the link?

Grab The Post URL

URL: https://bloggernizer.blogspot.com/2011/06/paper-of-record-should-recognize.html
HTML link code: <a href="https://bloggernizer.blogspot.com/2011/06/paper-of-record-should-recognize.html">bloggernizer: ‘Paper of record’ should recognize hypocrisy better than most "clickable"</a>
BB (forum) link code: [url=https://bloggernizer.blogspot.com/2011/06/paper-of-record-should-recognize.html]bloggernizer: ‘Paper of record’ should recognize hypocrisy better than most "clickable"[/url]