Why? To gin up hysteria over a manufactured "loophole"? [Read]
California gun owners have already bent over to such ridiculous lengths that they tolerate insults like "bullet buttons." As Brian Puckett wrote years back:
I've emailed the gun show proprietors and asked them if they post signs prohibiting unauthorized photographs and recording of patrons and dealers. I also note the covert video includes audio, and California appears to be a two-party consent state, which raises the question of whether or not our intrepid "undercover reporters" were the only lawbreakers in the room--funny, though, how they choose not to do covert ops against the population causing all the "gun" problems.
Anyone familiar with the law there who can give an authoritative interpretation of this, please chime in and educate us.
California gun owners have already bent over to such ridiculous lengths that they tolerate insults like "bullet buttons." As Brian Puckett wrote years back:
I sometimes wonder whether the socialists will issue an edict requiring all firearms to have a pink ribbon tied to the barrel, just to get a belly laugh as the panicked descendants of once-proud American patriots scurry to comply.Some of us tried to show a different approach by example, but that was not very well received by those who prefer being more "reasonable."
I've emailed the gun show proprietors and asked them if they post signs prohibiting unauthorized photographs and recording of patrons and dealers. I also note the covert video includes audio, and California appears to be a two-party consent state, which raises the question of whether or not our intrepid "undercover reporters" were the only lawbreakers in the room--funny, though, how they choose not to do covert ops against the population causing all the "gun" problems.
Anyone familiar with the law there who can give an authoritative interpretation of this, please chime in and educate us.