No US Navy Progress In Having A Replacement For The Ohio Submarine Replacement

Ohio-class submarine launches Trident ICBMs (artist concept)

Navy: Ohio Replacement Negotiations ‘Have Not Progressed’ -- USNI

The Navy’s top acquisition official told the Senate Armed Services Committee Seapower Subcommittee that talks with the Defense Department “have not progressed” in putting the Ohio-class ballistic-missile replacement program into a special National Capital Ships Account.

Testifying on 8 May, Sean Stackley said the long-range impact of keeping the 12 Ohio-class ballistic-missile submarines in the Navy’s shipbuilding account means “we will not be able to hit the numbers” to build other ships.

Even though costs have been driven down—from $7 billion per vessel to $4.9 billion—he said that effort “does not buy ship affordability.” The Navy’s shipbuilding plans five years from now call for spending $20 billion for 12 to 15 years to put the replacement ballistic missile submarines into the fleet. The Navy’s shipbuilding request for Fiscal Year 2014 is slightly more than $10 billion.

Read more ....

My Comment: It all comes down to money .... or a lack of.

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "No US Navy Progress In Having A Replacement For The Ohio Submarine Replacement"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus