If the Supreme Court gets this case and clearly upholds gun ownership as a right, it should at least deflate the political battle by ruling that courts should use only the most limited scrutiny in challenging gun laws. Firearms ownership must be treated as much as a privilege as a right.
This is the same bulls*** argument our buddy Erwin tried to pull the other day, so it appears the talking points have been distributed. "Limited scrutiny," or a variant thereof, is the new mantra we can expect to see more of.
And no, you arrogant fools at The Monitor--my rights are not privileges dependent on your or anyone's approval, and to imply there is any Constitutional basis to make this so is quite simply a damnable lie.
The outrageous travesty that property rights have been eroded through treasonous precedents is more a benchmark for how far we have allowed the ideals of liberty to be degraded by collectivism; it's certainly no justification for spreading the cancerous erosion to other foundational supports of the Republic.