Iran Never Halted Nuke Work In 2003

While UN inspectors monitor the spent nuclear fuel at the Bushehr power plant, worries are that there are other sites the inspectors don't know about. Photo from Radio Free Europe.

From The Washington Times:

Intelligence estimate contradicts '07 report.

U.S. intelligence agencies now suspect that Iran never halted work on its nuclear arms program in 2003, as stated in a national intelligence estimate made public three years ago, U.S. officials said.

Differences among analysts now focus on whether the country's supreme leader has given or will soon give orders for full-scale production of nuclear weapons.

The new consensus emerging among analysts in the 16 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community on Iran's nuclear arms program is expected to be the highlight of a classified national intelligence estimate nearing completion that will replace the estimate issued in 2007.

Read more ....

More News On Iran's Nuclear Program

Horrid 2007 Iran NIE To Be Revised -- Threats Watch
US intel agencies suspect Iran never halted nuclear arms work -- Washington TV
The Hopelessly Stupid Politics of the Iran NIE -- CATO&Liberty
Germany warns Iran it faces new sanctions -- Reuters
Merkel Backs More Sanctions Against Iran -- New York Times/AP
Iran Says German, Israeli Comments on Nuclear Issue "Repetitious" -- CRIEnglish
China urges flexibility over Iran -- AFP
China urges flexibility on Iran, downplays sanctions -- Reuters
China’s move to block new sanctions against Iran could have opposite effect -- Times Online
Bubble bursts on Iran nuclear options -- Asia Times
Iran Says Western Warships Would Be Targeted in Event of Attack -- Business Week
Iran threatens to hit Western warships if attacked -- Dawn
Q+A: Has Obama's offer to engage yielded any results? -- Reuters

Grab The Post URL

URL:
HTML link code:
BB (forum) link code:

Leave a comment

  • Google+
  • 0Blogger
  • Facebook
  • Disqus

0 Response to "Iran Never Halted Nuke Work In 2003"

Post a Comment

comments powered by Disqus