Two powerful aldermen are proposing a gun offender registry that would allow police to track people convicted of weapons violations...
Todd Vandermyde, a spokesman for the National Rifle Association, criticized the proposed registry, especially if it includes people convicted of misdemeanors.
"If they're talking about hard-core offenders, that's one thing," he said. "If they're trying to nail gun owners who make honest mistakes, that's another..."
What if it's not an "honest mistake," Todd?
What if it's intentional defiance of unconstitutional disarmament edicts?
How about this instead (?):
If you can't be trusted with a gun, you can't be trusted without a custodian.
If you're unfit to live in a free society, you're unfit to live free.
The rest of us, leave the hell alone. What part of "shall not be infringed" is that difficult, and when is NRA management going to admit that all "gun control," even the brand they endorse, is, at best, counterproductive, at worst, monstrously evil?
[Via HZ]